Nick Gall has been named a Leading Lawyer in The Doyle’s Guide to Leading White Collar Crime & Regulatory Investigations Lawyer Rankings – Hong Kong, 2019. Nick and the firm have also been recommended in the 2019 listing of Leading Hong Kong Criminal Lawyers and Law Firms 2019. The 2019 listing of leading Hong Kong
Gall wins Dispute Resolution Firm of the Year at The Asia Legal Awards 2019 hosted by The Asian Lawyer
We are delighted to have won Dispute Resolution Firm of the Year at this year’s Asia Legal Awards 2019. Winners were announced last night at the gala dinner hosted by The Asian Lawyer, honoring the best work in the region. Across their coverage of practice areas and disciplines, The Asia Legal Awards identify the most
Gall sponsors the 6th Asia Pacific Regional Forum Biennial Conference: Unified Asia
A conference presented by the IBA Asia Pacific Regional Forum in Tokyo, 27 February – 1 March 2019
Gall is proud to be a sponsor at this year’s Asia Pacific Regional Forum Biennial Conference presented by the IBA Asia Pacific Regional Forum. Partners Evelyn Chan and Nick Dealy are attending the conference in Tokyo. Topics to be covered over the course of the conference include: Shall we arbitrate or mediate, and where? Cryptocurrency at
Gall sponsors the University of Hong Kong Law Faculty’s Advocacy and Mooting Society
Gall is a proud long-term sponsor of The University of Hong Kong Law Faculty’s Advocacy and Mooting Society (“AMS”). AMS is a non-profit-making student-run organisation. Since its establishment in 2002, AMS is dedicated to developing advocacy skills and promoting mooting among law students. Through a variety of activities, namely mooting competitions and workshops, AMS seeks
Hong Kong courts: pro-arbitration in principle and in practice – Nick Gall and Ashima Sood contribute the Hong Kong chapter of The Dispute Resolution Global Guide 2019 published by Practical Law
This article considers the pro-arbitration approach of courts in Hong Kong in the context of two recent cases. It also considers other significant initiatives and developments in the arbitration regime concerning third party funding, consolidation, and costs of arbitrations. To view this article in PDF It is widely recognised that the pro-arbitration and pro-enforcement approach